www-ws-desc@w3.org from July 2004 by author

Allen Brookes

• RE: Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon (Thursday, 29 July)
• Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon (Thursday, 29 July)

Amelia A Lewis

• WSDL 2.0 part two last call last call (Friday, 30 July)
• Re: Proposed revised abstract (Friday, 30 July)
• Proposed revised abstract (Friday, 30 July)
• Re: Edits to part 2 (Friday, 30 July)
• Re: Edits to part 2 (Friday, 30 July)
• Re: Few more (significant) edits (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: Few more (significant) edits (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: Part 2 Features stuff (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: pls review text added for what "required" means (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: pls review text added for what "required" means (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) (Tuesday, 27 July)
• Re: Composition model (Monday, 26 July)
• Which came first, the function or the binding? (Tuesday, 20 July)
• Re: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Issue 232 [was RE: Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 plus 226, 227, 232] (Friday, 2 July)
• Re: absolute vs. relative URIs? (Friday, 2 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Thursday, 1 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Thursday, 1 July)
• Re: Issue 168 (Which Operation?) / Requirement R114 (Thursday, 1 July)

Anish Karmarkar

• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Friday, 23 July)
• Re: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support (Thursday, 8 July)
• Issue 488 closed (Friday, 2 July)

Asir Vedamuthu

• RE: Proposed revised abstract (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: 'ad:mustUnderstand', Schema Annotation Element? (was RE: Few more (significant) edits (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: 'ad:mustUnderstand', Schema Annotation Element? (was RE: Few more (significant) edits (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Few more (significant) edits (Thursday, 29 July)
• 'ad:mustUnderstand', Schema Annotation Element? (was RE: Few more (significant) edits (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: Minutes, 22 July 2004 Web Services Description WG telcon (Friday, 23 July)
• SOAP 11 Binding: Strawman Proposal B (Thursday, 22 July)
• Schemas for SOAP and HTTP Binding (Thursday, 22 July)
• RE: [Issue 226] Re: Cross-binding HTTP Features (Thursday, 22 July)
• Editorial Issue: Part 3 SOAP Binding (Thursday, 22 July)
• RE: HTTP binding mismatch and identification missing (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName (Saturday, 17 July)
• RE: Decouple SOAP Version from SOAP Binding ? (Friday, 16 July)
• RE: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName (Friday, 16 July)
• RE: Decouple SOAP Version from SOAP Binding ? (Friday, 16 July)
• Decouple SOAP Version from SOAP Binding ? (Thursday, 15 July)
• Part 1: Component reference vs. QName (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: Part 1: Editorial Issues (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Part 1: Editorial Issues (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: Atom API in WSDL 2.0 (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: absolute vs. relative URIs? (Friday, 2 July)

David Booth

• Re: pls review text added for what "required" means (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: pls review text added for what "required" means (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: pls review text added for what "required" means (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Intermediaries? (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) (Tuesday, 27 July)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Tuesday, 27 July)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Friday, 23 July)
• Resolution of issue 168 (Tuesday, 20 July)
• Re: Minutes, 15 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Friday, 16 July)
• Re: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 8 July)
• How to add links to other documents using xmlspec (Thursday, 1 July)

David Orchard

• FW: Issue 189 proposals: (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: (Monday, 26 July)
• RE: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) (Monday, 26 July)
• Issue 189 proposals: (Monday, 19 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Friday, 9 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Wednesday, 7 July)
• input serialization flexibility (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Wednesday, 7 July)
• Issue 189: Binding message content to URI (Tuesday, 6 July)
• 169 Syntax for webMethod - property or attribute? (Tuesday, 6 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Tuesday, 6 July)
• Atom API in WSDL 2.0 (Monday, 5 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Monday, 5 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Thursday, 1 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Thursday, 1 July)

Glen Daniels

• RE: Proposed revised abstract (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: Edits to part 2 (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon (Thursday, 29 July)
• Web page (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: 'ad:mustUnderstand', Schema Annotation Element? (was RE: Few more (significant) edits (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Few more (significant) edits (Thursday, 29 July)
• Minority Opinon re: Compositors [IONA, Oracle, Sonic, Sun] (Thursday, 29 July)
• Few more (significant) edits (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) (Tuesday, 27 July)
• Part 2 Features stuff (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: Requiredness (two issues) (Monday, 26 July)
• RE: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) (Monday, 26 July)
• Composition model (Monday, 26 July)
• Some new text (Monday, 26 July)
• Requiredness (two issues) (Monday, 26 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 8 July)

Hugo Haas

• Part 3: Added Application Feature; pending questions (was Re: Review LC drafts now!) (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: Intermediaries? (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: Review LC drafts now! (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: Issue 189 proposals: (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: Issue 189 proposals: (Tuesday, 27 July)
• Re: Issue 189 proposals: (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: Issue 189 proposals: (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: [Issue 165] Re: What happened about HTTPS in the HTTP binding? (Friday, 23 July)
• [Issue 165] Re: What happened about HTTPS in the HTTP binding? (Friday, 23 July)
• What happened about HTTPS in the HTTP binding? (Friday, 23 July)
• Re: [final] Agenda, 22 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 22 July)
• HTTP binding: unknown editorial note (Thursday, 22 July)
• Re: Resolution of issue 168 (Thursday, 22 July)
• Re: HTTP binding mismatch and identification missing (Wednesday, 21 July)
• [Issue 226] Re: Cross-binding HTTP Features (Wednesday, 21 July)
• HTTP binding mismatch and identification missing (Wednesday, 21 July)
• HTTP binding and interface operation MEP (Tuesday, 20 July)
• XMLP Issue 468 closed (Monday, 19 July)
• Re: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. (Friday, 16 July)
• Re: Editorial comments on Part 3 (Friday, 16 July)
• Re: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. (Friday, 16 July)
• Re: Decouple SOAP Version from SOAP Binding ? (Friday, 16 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: AD Feature: HTTP header conflicts (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Monday, 12 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Monday, 12 July)
• AD Feature: HTTP header conflicts (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 8 July)
• Editorial comments on Part 3 (Thursday, 1 July)
• Re: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. (Thursday, 1 July)
• Re: Issue 168 (Which Operation?) / Requirement R114 (Thursday, 1 July)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Monday, 12 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Thursday, 8 July)

Jeffrey Schlimmer

• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Friday, 9 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 7 July)

Jim Webber

• RE: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Friday, 9 July)

John Ibbotson

• Resolution of Issue 489 (Thursday, 1 July)

Jonathan Marsh

• [1st draft] Agenda: 2-4 August 2004 WS Description WG FTF (Thursday, 29 July)
• Review LC drafts now! (Tuesday, 27 July)
• [final] Agenda, 29 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: [Issue 165] Re: What happened about HTTPS in the HTTP binding? (Tuesday, 27 July)
• [draft] Agenda, 29 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 22 July)
• Minutes, 22 July 2004 Web Services Description WG telcon (Thursday, 22 July)
• FW: [corrected] Minutes, 15 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 22 July)
• [final] Agenda, 22 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 22 July)
• [draft] Agenda, 15 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Friday, 16 July)
• Minutes, 15 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 15 July)
• [final] Agenda, 15 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Minutes, 8 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Wednesday, 14 July)
• FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• [draft] Agenda, 15 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Friday, 9 July)
• Minutes, 8 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 7 July)
• Agenda, 8 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 7 July)
• [Draft] Agenda, 8 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Friday, 2 July)
• Issue 228 [was RE: updated draft to put F&P in more places] (Friday, 2 July)
• Issue 232 [was RE: Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 plus 226, 227, 232] (Friday, 2 July)
• RE: Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 plus 226, 227, 232 (Friday, 2 July)
• Issue 195 [was RE: Features and Properties versus Extensions] (Thursday, 1 July)
• Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 (Thursday, 1 July)
• Minutes: 1 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 1 July)

Liu, Kevin

• Re: Minority objection to features and properties (Friday, 30 July)

Marc Hadley

• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. (Wednesday, 14 July)

Mark Baker

• Re: Resolution of issue 168 (Thursday, 22 July)
• Re: Resolution of issue 168 (Tuesday, 20 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Monday, 12 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Monday, 5 July)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: Minutes, 8 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Friday, 16 July)
• Re: Minutes, 8 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Monday, 12 July)
• Issue 233: Dynamically Override Fault Destinations (proposal) (Monday, 5 July)
• Issue 230: {message label} vs {label} (Monday, 5 July)
• Allowable content in the types element (Monday, 5 July)
• Issue 220: Document interface extension semantics (Monday, 5 July)
• Re: Issue 211: Omitting interface messages in bindings (Monday, 5 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Thursday, 1 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Thursday, 1 July)

Martin Gudgin

• Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Thursday, 29 July)
• Minority objection to features and properties (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 20 July)
• RE: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName (Tuesday, 20 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)

paul.downey@bt.com

• RE: Review LC drafts now! (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: (Monday, 26 July)
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: (Monday, 26 July)
• Issue 166 - Binding of Faults in HTTP Binding (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: issue 235: definition of Fault (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: Decouple SOAP Version from SOAP Binding ? (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 8 July)
• which async binding/operation? (was Revised Asynch Binding) (Monday, 5 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Monday, 5 July)
• RE: absolute vs. relative URIs? (Friday, 2 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Thursday, 1 July)
• RE: Issue 168 (Which Operation?) / Requirement R114 (Thursday, 1 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Thursday, 1 July)
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Thursday, 1 July)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Thursday, 8 July)

Prasad Yendluri

• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Wednesday, 7 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Wednesday, 7 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Wednesday, 7 July)
• Re: Allowable content in the types element (Wednesday, 7 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Wednesday, 7 July)

Roberto Chinnici

• Re: 'ad:mustUnderstand', Schema Annotation Element? (was RE: Few more (significant) edits (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: Requiredness (two issues) (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: Property component's dependency on XML Schema (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Property component's dependency on XML Schema (Tuesday, 20 July)
• Re: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName (Monday, 19 July)
• Re: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName (Monday, 19 July)
• Re: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName (Friday, 16 July)
• Some notes on Part 1 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: AD Feature: HTTP header conflicts (Monday, 12 July)
• Re: Part 1: Editorial Issues (Monday, 12 July)
• Re: [Draft] Agenda, 8 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 6 July)
• Re: Agenda, 1 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Friday, 2 July)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• Re: Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon (Friday, 30 July)
• on "binding" the AD feature: where does the text go? (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: Issue 189 proposals: (Tuesday, 27 July)
• pls review text added for what "required" means (Monday, 26 July)
• Fw: request for clarification on closing issue 211 (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: Issue 189 proposals: (Monday, 26 July)
• help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: Issue 189 proposals: (Monday, 26 July)
• no SOAP binding for in-only operations? :-( (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: Some new text (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: Requiredness (two issues) (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: HTTP binding mismatch and identification missing (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName (Monday, 19 July)
• Re: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName (Monday, 19 July)
• issue 235: definition of Fault (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: [final] Agenda, 15 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Part 1: Editorial Issues (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• updating/verifying the URI refs section (appendix C) (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Monday, 12 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Tuesday, 13 July)
• discussion style (was: Re: Revised Asynch Binding) (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Monday, 12 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Monday, 12 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Monday, 12 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 8 July)
• "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Thursday, 8 July)
• Fw: Revised Asynch Binding (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Tuesday, 6 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Tuesday, 6 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Monday, 5 July)
• Re: which async binding/operation? (was Revised Asynch Binding) (Monday, 5 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Monday, 5 July)
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding (Sunday, 4 July)
• Re: Issue 228 [was RE: updated draft to put F&P in more places] (Saturday, 3 July)
• Fw: Minutes, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon (Friday, 2 July)
• absolute vs. relative URIs? (Friday, 2 July)
• Re: Agenda, 1 July 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 1 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Thursday, 1 July)
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. (Thursday, 1 July)

Savas Parastatidis

• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)

Tom Jordahl

• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• RE: updated draft to put F&P in more places (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Thursday, 8 July)

Ugo Corda

• RE: Minutes, 22 July 2004 Web Services Description WG telcon (Thursday, 22 July)
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Tuesday, 6 July)
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding (Monday, 5 July)

Umit Yalcinalp

• Re: Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon (Friday, 30 July)
• Re: Edits to part 2 (Friday, 30 July)
• Re: Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: Requiredness (two issues) (Monday, 26 July)
• Proposed resolution for Issue 206 (Thursday, 22 July)
• Proposed Resolution for Issue 205 (Thursday, 22 July)
• Proposed resolution for Issue 201 (Thursday, 22 July)
• CORRECTION Proposed Resolution for Issue 162 (Thursday, 22 July)
• Proposed Resolution for Issue 161: (Thursday, 22 July)
• Re: Issue 162: (Thursday, 22 July)
• Issue 162: (Thursday, 22 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: AD Feature: HTTP header conflicts (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Wednesday, 7 July)
• New Issue: MTOM/XOP support, probably editorial (Saturday, 3 July)
• Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 (Saturday, 3 July)
• Re: Issue 232 [was RE: Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 plus 226, 227, 232] (Friday, 2 July)
• Re: Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 plus 226, 227, 232 (Friday, 2 July)
• Re: Issue 168 (Which Operation?) / Requirement R114 (Thursday, 1 July)

Last message date: Friday, 30 July 2004 15:37:44 UTC