"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> writes: > > I'm not sure what the point of your email is Sanjiva... The point of the email was to lament that this looks awfully un-user friendly to me. I know its an accepted position and I'm not making a counter proposal. > Hugo has already found his answer, which hopefully is that the rest of > the xml is not serialized at all. That's not what I read .. the rest of it goes in the payload of the POST. Is that not correct? > Do you have a counter-proposal for terminating the "case element not > cited" part of the algorithm? Sanjiva.Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2004 04:45:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT