RE: 'ad:mustUnderstand', Schema Annotation Element? (was RE: Few more (significant) edits

Indeed!

Asir

-----Original Message-----
From: Glen Daniels [mailto:gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 3:19 PM
To: Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM; Asir Vedamuthu
Cc: Amelia A Lewis; www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: RE: 'ad:mustUnderstand', Schema Annotation Element? (was RE: Few
more (significant) edits



So as I understand it, then, using the attribute *is* actually OK to
annotate the schema, and I don't need to change this part.  Yes?

--Glen 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM [mailto:Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 12:13 PM
> To: Asir Vedamuthu
> Cc: Glen Daniels; Amelia A Lewis; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: 'ad:mustUnderstand', Schema Annotation Element? 
> (was RE: Few more (significant) edits
> 
> Asir Vedamuthu wrote:
> > 'ad:mustUnderstand' is an out-of-band attribute. AFAIK, 
> this attribute 
> > is unreachable (via element declaration component). I raised this 
> > issue on June 29th [1]. And, you addressed my concern:
>  >
> > [1] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jun/0281.html
> > [2] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jun/0285.html
> > [3] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jun/0285.html
> 
> It is reachable. Quoting from [4], section 3.13.2: (the 
> uppercase is mine)
> 
>    Property
> 
>    {attributes}
> 
>    Representation
> 
>    A sequence of attribute information items, namely those 
> allowed by the
>    attribute wildcard in the type definition for the <annotation> item
>    itself OR FOR THE ENCLOSING ITEMS WHICH CORRESPOND TO THE COMPONENT
>    WITHIN WHICH THE ANNOTATION COMPONENT IS LOCATED.
> 
> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/#cAnnotations
> 
> Roberto
> 
> 
>