Re: Proposed revised abstract

Okay.

On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:50:50 -0700
Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com> wrote:

> > features, SOAP 1.2 modules
> 
> I don't see a reason why we have to use the phrase 'SOAP 1.2 module' in
> Part 2. One of the reasons for changing from soap:mustUnderstand="true"
> to ad:mustUnderstand="true" is to move away from a specific version of
> SOAP. My suggestion is to use the phrase "SOAP modules" instead of "SOAP
> 1.2 modules".
> 
> Asir
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Amelia A Lewis
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 11:33 AM
> To: WS Description List
> Subject: Proposed revised abstract
> 
> 
> 
> Hugo pointed out that part two needs a revised abstract.
> 
> Herewith:
> 
> This document describes extensions for the Web Services Description
> Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 . These extensions include Message Exchange
> Patterns (MEPs), features, SOAP 1.2 modules, and bindings of features. 
> The Working Group has discussed and approved these extensions, and
> recommends their use with the Web Services Description Language (WSDL).
> 
> Silence gives assent.
> 
> Amy!
> (Silence is death)
> -- 
> Amelia A. Lewis
> Senior Architect
> TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> alewis@tibco.com


-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Senior Architect
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com

Received on Friday, 30 July 2004 14:50:52 UTC