W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114

From: Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:22:24 -0700
Message-ID: <40F43670.4040602@oracle.com>
To: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org


Amelia A Lewis wrote:

>On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:10:04 -0700
>Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>So, the idea is not to restrict/expose how to dispatch. It is to expose 
>>to the client what the client must do. Dispatching is web service's 
>>business, exposing the necessary contract is WSDL's.
>>    
>>
>
>Absolutely agreed.
>
>So you agree that we don't need a feature on the abstract interface that
>indicates how dispatch is accomplished?  It is unnecessary to the
>contract.
>
>Amy!
>  
>
Come on. Playing with words do not get anywhere here.

We do need a MANDATORY extension in WSDL which exposes what the client 
must to for dispatch. It is necessary for the contract.

--umit

-- 
Umit Yalcinalp                                  
Consulting Member of Technical Staff
ORACLE
Phone: +1 650 607 6154                          
Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 15:27:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT