W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

Re: absolute vs. relative URIs?

From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 10:10:16 -0400
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-id: <8B38EC16-CC31-11D8-93B3-0050E4707F03@tibco.com>

+1 and editorial, I think.

On Jul 2, 2004, at 2:12 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

>
> In editing @style I noticed that we don't say "absolute URI"
> there .. and in a few other places. We do say it in some
> places.
>
> It seems to me that all URIs *except* import/@location and
> include/@location MUST absolutely be absolute. Those two MAY
> be absolute or relative. I see no value in allowing relative
> URIs for the others.
>
> If you agree +1 it please .. I'll fix the wording then.
>
> Sanjiva.
>
Received on Friday, 2 July 2004 10:10:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT