Re: absolute vs. relative URIs?

+1 and editorial, I think.

On Jul 2, 2004, at 2:12 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

>
> In editing @style I noticed that we don't say "absolute URI"
> there .. and in a few other places. We do say it in some
> places.
>
> It seems to me that all URIs *except* import/@location and
> include/@location MUST absolutely be absolute. Those two MAY
> be absolute or relative. I see no value in allowing relative
> URIs for the others.
>
> If you agree +1 it please .. I'll fix the wording then.
>
> Sanjiva.
>