W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 13:49:35 +0100
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF1A033049@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>, <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

+1 to that, Jeff!

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Schlimmer
Sent: 07 July 2004 22:30
To: Umit Yalcinalp; WS Description List
Subject: RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114

WSDL 2.0 should not require identifying the operation name because doing
so will unnecessarily limit the applicability of WSDL 2.0.

R114 mandates that the WSD language define a way to uniquely map, but it
does not mandate that each WSDL document must uniquely map.

The RPC style (http://www.w3.org/2004/03/wsdl/style/rpc) defines a way
to uniquely map and therefore satisfies R114. Nothing else is needed.

Received on Thursday, 8 July 2004 09:03:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:49 UTC