W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

RE: [Issue 165] Re: What happened about HTTPS in the HTTP binding?

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:24:29 -0700
Message-ID: <DF1BAFBC28DF694A823C9A8400E71EA2045D13D3@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Thanks, that sounds good to me.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hugo Haas [mailto:hugo@w3.org]
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 11:05 AM
> To: Jonathan Marsh; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [Issue 165] Re: What happened about HTTPS in the HTTP
> binding?
> 
> * Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org> [2004-07-23 13:49+0200]
> [..]
> > So I think that we need to do two things:
> > 1. retitle issue 165 to say: HTTPS and Authentication support
> > 2. put back in the draft the handling of HTTPS based on the URI
scheme,
> >    with some text like in [6].
> >
> > I am afraid that if we don't do (2), we will have to reopen issue
165.
> 
> I have managed to track down the disappearance of the sentence.
> 
> It is in wsdl20-bindings.html version 1.26:
> 
>   http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-
> bindings.html?rev=1.26&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
> 
> but disappeared in version 1.27:
> 
>   http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-
> bindings.html?rev=1.27&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
> 
> As the draft was changed a lot to implement the decisions taken during
> the May F2F and that I have seen no decision to get rid of this rule,
> I will put it back.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hugo
> 
> --
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2004 11:25:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT