W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114

From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 11:19:22 -0400
To: paul.downey@bt.com
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-id: <20040708111922.66a75295.alewis@tibco.com>

+! from me as well.

On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 13:49:35 +0100
paul.downey@bt.com wrote:

> 
> +1 to that, Jeff!
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Jeffrey Schlimmer
> Sent: 07 July 2004 22:30
> To: Umit Yalcinalp; WS Description List
> Subject: RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114
> 
> WSDL 2.0 should not require identifying the operation name because doing
> so will unnecessarily limit the applicability of WSDL 2.0.
> 
> R114 mandates that the WSD language define a way to uniquely map, but it
> does not mandate that each WSDL document must uniquely map.
> 
> The RPC style (http://www.w3.org/2004/03/wsdl/style/rpc) defines a way
> to uniquely map and therefore satisfies R114. Nothing else is needed.
> 
> --Jeff
> 


-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Senior Architect
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2004 11:19:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT