- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:02:34 +0600
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org> writes:
>
> If I have:
>
> <data>
> <a>1</a>
> <b>2</b>
> <c>3</c>
> <d>4</d>
> </data>
>
> then the draft as it stands says that:
> - location="{a}/{b}" serializes as "1/2?c=3&d=4"
> - location="{a}/{b}/" serializes as "1/2/?c=3&d=4"
>
> Now, your proposal is that location="{a}/{b/}" serializes as "1/2",
> and that the rest be serialized as application/xml, i.e.:
>
> <data>
> <c>3</c>
> <d>4</d>
> </data>
>
> Am I right?
I have to say .. this is just too much black art for me. How do you
expect users to distinguish between "{a}/{b/}" and "{a}/{b}/" with
such serious implications?
I know we accepted this, but its not a winner feature IMO.
Sanjiva.
Received on Monday, 26 July 2004 16:03:45 UTC