W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

Re: Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 plus 226, 227, 232

From: Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:41:28 -0700
Message-ID: <40E4AF38.4050505@oracle.com>
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: Web Services Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>


Jonathan Marsh wrote:

>And these two as well:
> - 226 Cross-binding HTTP features
> - 232 Differentiate our MEPs from underlying protocol MEPs 
>
Jonathan,

I am ok with the previous set but not clear why you are proposing to 
mark 232 an editorial item. Could we see the text please?

Thanks.

--umit

>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
>>    
>>
>On
>  
>
>>Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
>>Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 3:20 PM
>>To: Web Services Description
>>Subject: Issues 227, 231, 234, 235
>>
>>
>>The WG previously agreed to refer these editorial issues to the
>>    
>>
>editors,
>  
>
>>who were to come back if they had issues with anything therein:
>>- (ed) 208 Misc. editorial comments
>>- (ed) 213 Refine component model property constraints
>>- (ed) 215 Clarify rule obviation
>>
>>I propose we do the same with the following editorial issues:
>>- 227 Description of Binding Operation component
>>- 231 Clarify "patterns"
>>- 234 Ruleset terminology
>>- 235 Definition of Fault
>>
>>If you wish to discuss any of these issues in detail, please let me
>>know, otherwise I'll refer them to the editors for resolution on
>>Thursday without discussion.
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Umit Yalcinalp                                  
Consulting Member of Technical Staff
ORACLE
Phone: +1 650 607 6154                          
Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com
Received on Thursday, 1 July 2004 20:42:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT