- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:38:59 -0400
- To: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Cc: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>, www-ws-desc@w3.org, Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>, Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>, Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org, David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>
At 04:30 PM 7/26/2004 -0700, Anish Karmarkar wrote: >David Booth wrote: >>Anish, >>The out-in MEP does involve the requester agent sending a message, so an >>optional feature could be relevant for that MEP. > >The requester agent sends a message _after_ the message is sent by the >provider agent. So, in this respect I am not sure how this is different >than out-only MEP. Correct. For the initial "out" message it is the same situation as the out-only case, but for the subsequent "in" message an optional feature might be relevant. -- David Booth W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2004 14:39:16 UTC