W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

Re: Few more (significant) edits

From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:55:49 -0400
To: Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-id: <20040729115549.23263702.alewis@tibco.com>

Saw it, but didn't see a followup.  You can get *Glen* to repurpose
things, but all you can get *me* to do is cook^Wedit.

*laugh*

Raise an edtodo officially?  Consider this to be officially creating an
edtodo issue, or pair of issues: glen to change the element; me to make
required ed changes.

Amy!
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:48:48 -0700
Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com> wrote:

> Please see,
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0361.html
> 
> Asir
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Amelia A Lewis
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 11:43 AM
> To: Glen Daniels
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Few more (significant) edits
> 
> 
> 
> SUMMARY: all actions specified by Glen committed, except text that he
> now owes me.  Details are below for some actions.
> 
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:07:15 -0400
> Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com> wrote:
> > * Missed this before - section 3.1.4 (the AD Module) should actually
> > be promoted to section 3.2, with appropriate promoting of subsections.
> 
> DONE.
> 
> > * We decided to accept the abstract ad:mustUnderstand attribute on the
> > schema instead of using the soap-specific one.  This change was never
> > actually made to the proposal!  This requires some surgery.  On the
> > bright side, it simplifies the schema for the example
> > "isGoldClubMember" element:
> > 
> >     <element name="isGoldClubMember"
> >              type="xs:boolean"
> >              ad:mustUnderstand="true"/>
> 
> DONE.
> 
> > I can do this in a number of ways.  1) I can write you the text, 2)
> > you can hand me the XML and I'll edit and hand back to you, 3) you can
> > sign me up as a part 2 editor and I could edit it in CVS.  I'm OK with
> > any of those, let me know.
> 
> Write me text, please.  We need this as close to immediately as
> possible, in order to include it in Last Call.
> 
> I already cut the last clause of the last sentence (mentioning soap
> mustUnderstand) in the description.
> 
> > * "as defined in the Application Data feature" (what is currently sec
> > 3.1.4.2), the words "Application Data feature" should link to section
> > 3.2.
> 
> DONE.
>  
> > * Other places in the document single-quote URIs.  I would suggest
> > doing the same for the feature/property URIs in section 3.  In fact, I
> > think it might look better if we actually  bolded or italicized these
> > URIs - is there any precedent for that?
> 
> I can change the quote style.  Otherwise, bold or italic sounds like a
> stylesheet issue, so bring up presentation issues with the Guardians of
> Presentation Beauty (which is I-don't-know-who-only-it-isn't-me).
> 
> Amy!
> -- 
> Amelia A. Lewis
> Senior Architect
> TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> alewis@tibco.com


-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Senior Architect
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 11:56:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT