Hi, Hugo just added some text to the bindings doc documenting how the AD feature manifests itself in the HTTP case. I'd like to suggest a different way of documenting how the AD feature (and any binding implications of anything we put into the predefined extensions document): include them in that document itself. To make that more sensible, I'd like to reorder the parts: part1: core language (as is) part2: bindings (currently part3) part3: predefined extensions (currently part2) Since the dependency is circular we can't avoid forward refs but IMO this ordering makes most sense because now we can have the predefined extensions *fully* defined (including bindings of them) in that document itself. Sanjiva.Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 11:57:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:14:47 GMT