- From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:25:29 -0400
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM, Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk, www-ws-desc@w3.org
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 00:15:38 -0700 Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com> wrote: > I'm with Jim. I think operations are an illusion. All they are is a > *WSDL level* construct for grouping messages in an exchange. The fact > that when using RPC style the messages exchanges are typically In-Out > with different input and output messages for each operation does not > mean that all message exchanges look like that. Big +1 As others have said on this subject, if someone wants to place some details of how they are performing dispatching in the WSDL, that's fine; I'm not opposed to an optional feature or extension of that sort. I'm strongly opposed to mandating this, because I've had to deal frequently with customer-generated WSDL for which such a required feature would be meaningless. Failing to deliver what the [potential] users of the spec require strikes me as a Really Bad Idea. Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Senior Architect TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2004 11:26:21 UTC