W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

RE: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 05:03:22 -0700
Message-ID: <5B10E50E14A4594EB1B5566B69AD94072EF657@maileast>
To: "'paul.downey@bt.com'" <paul.downey@bt.com>, Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org

Paul,

> There was some discussion of this following the proposal to 
> hoist faults:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jan/0062.html

Thank you. I read this thread. My question is not at the XML representation
level but, at the -component- level. Let me quote from part 1,

"{fault reference} REQUIRED. A wsdls:QName as defined by 2.15.5 QName Type
which refers to an Interface Fault component in the {faults} property of the
Interface component identified by the {interface} property of the parent
Binding component. This is the Interface Fault component for which binding
information is being specified." [1]

Let me re-state my question. {fault reference} property appears to be a
component reference. Per part 1, {fault reference} property is a
wsdls:QName.  Thus, the following two properties stand out,

(a) Binding Fault Component.{fault reference}
(b) Binding Operation Component.{operation reference}

Their values are of type wsdls:QName instead of Interface Fault/Operation
component. Is that intentional?

[1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-
type=text/html%3B0charset=utf-8#Binding_Fault_details

Asir

-----Original Message-----
From: paul.downey@bt.com [mailto:paul.downey@bt.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 9:41 AM
To: asirv@webmethods.com; www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: RE: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName


Asir,

AIUI fault and operations are identified using ncnames, but referenced
using qnames, since the same fault name may exist in one or more interface. 

There was some discussion of this following the proposal to hoist faults:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jan/0062.html

HTH
Paul



-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
Sent: 15 July 2004 13:39
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName



In part 1 component model, the following properties (see below) appear to be
component references but, they are described as QNames. Is that intentional?

- Binding Fault Component.{fault reference} [1]
- Binding Operation Component.{operation reference} [2]

[1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-
type=text/html%3B0charset=utf-8#Binding_Fault_details

[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-
type=text/html%3B0charset=utf-8#Binding_Operation_details

Regards,
Asir S Vedamuthu
asirv at webmethods dot com
http://www.webmethods.com/ 
Received on Friday, 16 July 2004 08:08:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT