W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

Re: Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon

From: Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:45:04 -0700
Message-ID: <41097DF0.9080903@oracle.com>
To: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Cc: Allen Brookes <abrookes@roguewave.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org


Glen Daniels wrote:

>Hi Umit:
>
>  
>
>>>11. Other new issues
>>>- Glen's property comments [.1, .2]
>>>- Glen's composition model comment [.3] - Don't reopen!
>>>- Help with unique GED language [.4]
>>>- Issue 211 resolution clarification [.5]
>>>- pls review text added for what "required" means [.6]  [.1] 
>>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0319.html>
>>>[.2] 
>>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0320.html>
>>>[.3] 
>>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0323.html>
>>>[.4] 
>>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0328.html>
>>>[.5] 
>>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0331.html>
>>>[.6] 
>>>      
>>>
>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0333.html> 
>>    
>>
>>>	Glen: Required flag on properties makes no sense 
>>>	... must be understood by the runtime anyway. 
>>>	Umit: required means that the property needs to be 
>>>      
>>>
>>given a value not 
>>    
>>
>>>that it be understood
>>>	... don't remove now 
>>>	Jonathan: we can discuss this next week 
>>>	ACTION: editors incorporate "some new text" into 
>>>      
>>>
>>section 2.8.1 of part 
>>    
>>
>>>1
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>This is not what we have agreed to. We have agreed not to do 
>>right now going to last call, and we will deal with this as a 
>>LC issue. I don't think my telephone connection was that bad. ;-)
>>    
>>
>
>You're thinking of the wrong issue, Umit.  The text we agreed to was
>from my mail at [.2] above, NOT the removal of the required flag on
>property, which is what you were concerned about.
>
>--Glen
>
>  
>
Well, the way the minutes minutes read is a bit misleading that is why i 
wanted the clarification of the minutes. It will be hard to remember 
what happened 2 months from now as there are several issues listed in 
this section.

Thanks for the clarification,

--umit

-- 
Umit Yalcinalp                                  
Consulting Member of Technical Staff
ORACLE
Phone: +1 650 607 6154                          
Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 18:46:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT