W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114

From: Savas Parastatidis <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:37:38 +0100
Message-ID: <37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA800103DBDF@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Hey Paul,

 
> > In fact, I would propose that the WSDL group
> > considers the ban of verbs from operation names :-)))
> 
> Er, isn't "process" a verb in this context?
> - i think you better had find a better name :^)
> 

Please note that I did say that "processMessage" is abstract (at the
architecture level) and not explicitly included inside any WSDL
document.

> sorry Savas, i'm feeling a bit prickly this afternoon!
> 

:-)) no problem! :-)

Regards,
.savas.
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2004 13:37:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT