RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 from Savas Parastatidis on 2004-07-14 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from July 2004)

From: Savas Parastatidis <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:37:38 +0100
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA800103DBDF@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk>

Hey Paul,

 
> > In fact, I would propose that the WSDL group
> > considers the ban of verbs from operation names :-)))
> 
> Er, isn't "process" a verb in this context?
> - i think you better had find a better name :^)
> 

Please note that I did say that "processMessage" is abstract (at the
architecture level) and not explicitly included inside any WSDL
document.

> sorry Savas, i'm feeling a bit prickly this afternoon!
> 

:-)) no problem! :-)

Regards,
.savas.

Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2004 13:37:49 UTC