W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

Re: which async binding/operation? (was Revised Asynch Binding)

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 21:26:07 +0600
Message-ID: <0d2b01c462a4$65e76a80$84614109@LANKABOOK>
To: <paul.downey@bt.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Yep this is indeed an issue. I am going to make a simple proposal
for this too ..

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
To: <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 8:29 PM
Subject: which async binding/operation? (was Revised Asynch Binding)


> On a related note, i did wonder if the wsa:ReplyTo address (or some such)
> identifies the endpoint URI, is there an issue in routing the message 
> back to originating binding or operation?
> 
> i.e. if more than one binding shares the same endpoint URI and/or more
> than one operation uses the same response message, it is possible to 
> publish an ambiguous WSDL. 
> 
> i guess this is similar to the "which operation" issue and could benefit 
> from the same resolution/text.
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Sent: 04 July 2004 17:16
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Revised Asynch Binding
> 
> [snip]
Received on Monday, 5 July 2004 11:26:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT