W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

RE: Proposed revised abstract

From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:00:36 -0400
Message-ID: <80A43FC052CE3949A327527DCD5D6B276287C5@MAIL01.bedford.progress.com>
To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>, "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>, "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>


> > features, SOAP 1.2 modules
> 
> I don't see a reason why we have to use the phrase 'SOAP 1.2 
> module' in Part 2. One of the reasons for changing from 
> soap:mustUnderstand="true" to ad:mustUnderstand="true" is to 
> move away from a specific version of SOAP. My suggestion is 
> to use the phrase "SOAP modules" instead of "SOAP 1.2 modules".

+1.  Nothing prevents the module/properties architecture from being used
with SOAP 1.1.

--G
Received on Friday, 30 July 2004 14:00:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT