RE: absolute vs. relative URIs?

+1 so long as we're only talking about namespace URIs 
ie. not URIs that resolve to a document (ok i'm ignoring RDDL)
 
 

 -----Original Message----- 
 From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org on behalf of Sanjiva Weerawarana 
 Sent: Fri 02/07/2004 07:12 
 To: www-ws-desc@w3.org 
 Cc: 
 Subject: absolute vs. relative URIs?
 
 


 In editing @style I noticed that we don't say "absolute URI"
 there .. and in a few other places. We do say it in some
 places.
 
 It seems to me that all URIs *except* import/@location and
 include/@location MUST absolutely be absolute. Those two MAY
 be absolute or relative. I see no value in allowing relative
 URIs for the others.
 
 If you agree +1 it please .. I'll fix the wording then.
 
 Sanjiva.

Received on Friday, 2 July 2004 03:39:25 UTC