W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:30:01 +0200
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-id: <40EE5789.9020304@crf.canon.fr>

I have a bit of an issue with this. Setting @wsoap:action is not legal 
on all message.

For example, in the case of a mere in-out interaction, @wsoap:action is 
legal only on the "in" message, not on the "out". At least in SOAP 1.2 
terms (SOAP initial receivers do not support the action parameter). 
Although I guess it could still be set but ignored by SOAP initial 
receivers.

JJ.

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote (snip):

> <>However, I neglected to note that in order to do that properly we'd 
> have to move wsoap:action to each message level rather than keeping it 
> at the operation level:
Received on Friday, 9 July 2004 04:31:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT