RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 from Martin Gudgin on 2004-07-14 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from July 2004)

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 00:15:37 -0700
To: "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DD35CC66F54D8248B6E04232892B6338025DA43C@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jim Webber
> Sent: 14 July 2004 01:12
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114
> 
<SNIP/>
> 
> Now if you make the dispatch public you might think you can 
> get round that problem, but I contend that how I dispatch my 
> messages is of no importance to my consumers. If I tell you 
> how I'm going to dispatch you will use that in your code (you 
> know you will because it will make your life easier) but then 
> when I go and change something I break you.

Big +1. Exposing dispatching details is very likely to lead to tighter
coupling. Which IMO is bad.

Gudge

Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2004 03:15:58 UTC