- From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:50:50 -0700
- To: 'Amelia A Lewis' <alewis@tibco.com>, WS Description List <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> features, SOAP 1.2 modules I don't see a reason why we have to use the phrase 'SOAP 1.2 module' in Part 2. One of the reasons for changing from soap:mustUnderstand="true" to ad:mustUnderstand="true" is to move away from a specific version of SOAP. My suggestion is to use the phrase "SOAP modules" instead of "SOAP 1.2 modules". Asir -----Original Message----- From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Amelia A Lewis Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 11:33 AM To: WS Description List Subject: Proposed revised abstract Hugo pointed out that part two needs a revised abstract. Herewith: This document describes extensions for the Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 . These extensions include Message Exchange Patterns (MEPs), features, SOAP 1.2 modules, and bindings of features. The Working Group has discussed and approved these extensions, and recommends their use with the Web Services Description Language (WSDL). Silence gives assent. Amy! (Silence is death) -- Amelia A. Lewis Senior Architect TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Friday, 30 July 2004 11:54:52 UTC