W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

RE: Proposed revised abstract

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:50:50 -0700
Message-ID: <5B10E50E14A4594EB1B5566B69AD9407068E67C5@maileast>
To: 'Amelia A Lewis' <alewis@tibco.com>, WS Description List <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

> features, SOAP 1.2 modules

I don't see a reason why we have to use the phrase 'SOAP 1.2 module' in Part
2. One of the reasons for changing from soap:mustUnderstand="true" to
ad:mustUnderstand="true" is to move away from a specific version of SOAP. My
suggestion is to use the phrase "SOAP modules" instead of "SOAP 1.2
modules".

Asir

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Amelia A Lewis
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 11:33 AM
To: WS Description List
Subject: Proposed revised abstract



Hugo pointed out that part two needs a revised abstract.

Herewith:

This document describes extensions for the Web Services Description
Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 . These extensions include Message Exchange
Patterns (MEPs), features, SOAP 1.2 modules, and bindings of features. 
The Working Group has discussed and approved these extensions, and
recommends their use with the Web Services Description Language (WSDL).

Silence gives assent.

Amy!
(Silence is death)
-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Senior Architect
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com
Received on Friday, 30 July 2004 11:54:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT