W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

Re: Issue 211: Omitting interface messages in bindings

From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 12:26:33 -0700
Message-Id: <39A5D0C8-CEB9-11D8-8B38-000A95BD86C0@bea.com>
To: Web Services Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

I had an AI to propose a solution to 211 that was in the definition of 
Binding Operations, rather than Binding Message References, and in 
clearer prose.

Add this after the third paragraph ("For each Binding Operation...") of 
2.11.1:

For each Binding Message Reference in the {message references} property 
of a Binding Operation component, there MUST be an Interface Message 
Reference with the same {message label} and {direction} properties in 
the corresponding Interface Operation. Note that the converse is not 
required; i.e., there need not be a Binding Message Reference 
corresponding to each Interface Message Reference in the Interface 
Operation component.


--
Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
Received on Monday, 5 July 2004 15:26:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT