W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

Re: Issue 232 [was RE: Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 plus 226, 227, 232]

From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:38:46 -0400
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: Web Services Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-id: <E7E372B1-CC3D-11D8-93B3-0050E4707F03@tibco.com>

On Jul 2, 2004, at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> The second part is adding a little explanation differentiating WSDL 
> MEPs from SOAP MEPs or another protocol's MEPs that might be in use in 
> the underlying protocol.  Rather than qualifying WSDL MEPs as 
> Interface MEPs as Mark suggests (they are already qualified as WSDL 
> MEPs), perhaps we should just add an explanatory sentence to the first 
> paragraph of the intro along the lines of:
>
>   "Web Services Description Language (WSDL) message exchange patterns
>   define the sequence and cardinality of abstract messages listed in
>   an operation. WSDL message exchange patterns also define which other
>   nodes send messages to, and receive messages from, the service
>   implementing the operation.  WSDL message exchange patterns describe
>   the interaction at the abstract (interface) level, which may be
>   distinct from the pattern used by the underlying protocol binding
>   (e.g. SOAP Message Exchange Patterns <ref>)."
>
> Mark, Amy, what do you think?

Works for me.  Thanks for doing the hard work.  :-)  Mark?

Amy!
Received on Friday, 2 July 2004 11:39:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT