W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

Re: Revised Asynch Binding

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:24:13 +0200
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-id: <40F23C9D.5010109@crf.canon.fr>

Hi Sanjiva,

The way I was reading Dave's proposal, he was not hijacking the current 
SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding, but using it twice "in sequence", to provide the 
2-MEP equivalent. Maybe he meant something else? I don't want to put 
words in his mouth.

JJ.

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

>>I am a bit uneasy about creating new (SOAP) bindings uncesserily. In 
>>certain circumstances, I agree with Sanjiva, this is unavoidable. 
>>However, for simpler cases, I like Dave's idea of essentially providing 
>>a "MEP scripting language". This helps reuse existing bindings when 
>>applicable.
>>    
>>
>
>But at what price? I don't like the price of 2 SOAP-MEPs for one
>WSDL MEP. Furthermore, Dave's doing at best a liberal reading of
>SOAP1.2 and, at worst a full-scale violation of it to achieve the
>2 SOAP-MEP thing using the current SOAP-HTTP binding.
>  
>
Received on Monday, 12 July 2004 03:25:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT