W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:31:40 +0100
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709DA50@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Savas wrote:

> In fact, "processThis" or "processMessage" (we are looking for a better 
> name :-) is the only _operation_ that is supported and it's
> abstract, part of the architectural model rather than the realisation
> that we call Web Services.

given i'm not yet convinced i'm going to know will happen or which message 
i'll receive in response when i send a service a message, i suggest renaming 
"processThis" to "iFeelLucky" :^)

> In fact, I would propose that the WSDL group
> considers the ban of verbs from operation names :-))) 

Er, isn't "process" a verb in this context?
- i think you better had find a better name :^)

sorry Savas, i'm feeling a bit prickly this afternoon!

Paul
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2004 13:31:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT