W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding.

From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:58:53 -0400
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-id: <20040709105853.4d7713f4.alewis@tibco.com>

I am in entire agreement with Sanjiva on this topic.

On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 19:14:18 +0600
Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
> I still haven't seen a defined semantic of what @webMethod="GET" or
> @webMethod="POST" means in a generic sense. Can you please provide
> those semantics? What are the accepted values for @webMethod?
> 
> Unless such semantics can be given *in an HTTP independent manner*
> and they can potentially be bound to other protocols, I'm most
> definitely -1 on adding @webMethod to interface/operation.
> 
> I would specifically appreciate your explaining the relationship
> between @webMethod and @safe (the latter of which we already have).
> Also, in a SOAP world, how would @webMethod interact with
> wsoap:mep (and the implied HTTP method when SOAP/HTTP is in use)?

Amy!
-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Senior Architect
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com
Received on Friday, 9 July 2004 10:59:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT