public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from October to December 2010 by author

Alexandre Passant

• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results (Thursday, 23 December)
• Format of SPARQL Update results (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Thursday, 23 December)
• SPARQL 1.1 document updated (ISSUE-59) (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Draft comment to MS-1 (ACTION-335) (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: Update shortcuts summary and discussion (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Nov. 9, 2010 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Nov. 9, 2010 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• ISSUE-59 - Shortcuts for Update (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: Proposed response to DB-1 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Proposed response to DB-1 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Fixing the update test case vocabulary. (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: SPARQL1.1 Update review part 2 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL1.1 Update review part 2 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Thursday, 7 October)
• SPARQL Update 1.1 ready for review (Sunday, 3 October)
• Re: Resolution for ISSUE-37 (Sunday, 3 October)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Sunday, 3 October)

Andy Seaborne

• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Friday, 31 December)
• Re: WSDL and POSTing SPARQL Update requests directly (Wednesday, 29 December)
• Re: Details of dateTime operations (Monday, 27 December)
• Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 (Monday, 27 December)
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) (Friday, 24 December)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Call for issues and comment on JSON result format (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Update security issues (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Changes to editor's draft of the SPARQL 1.1 HTTP Protocol (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: new version of fed query (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: Call for issues and comment on JSON result format (Sunday, 19 December)
• Re: Another thing on property paths... (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Another thing on property paths... (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Another thing on property paths... (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Another thing on property paths... (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Call for issues and comment on JSON result format (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: critical open ACTIONS for LC... (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: stumbled upon ACTION-200 CONSTRUCT WHERE shortcut... (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Dave Beckett's Comment (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: md5sum and sha1sum functions (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Details of string operations (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Details of string operations (Saturday, 4 December)
• Re: Details of dateTime operations (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Details of dateTime operations (Friday, 3 December)
• Details of dateTime operations (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Details of string operations (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Details of string operations (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Details of string operations (Thursday, 2 December)
• Details of string operations (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Draft response: JP-1 (Property Paths) (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re: Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re: Changes to Query 1.1 doc (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: Changes to Query 1.1 doc (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Saturday, 27 November)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Saturday, 27 November)
• Re: SPARQL protocol and HTTP Update : HTML file upload (Friday, 26 November)
• Grammar updated (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: POST & HTTP Update (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: SPARQL protocol and HTTP Update : HTML file upload (Thursday, 25 November)
• POST & HTTP Update (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: SPARQL protocol and HTTP Update : HTML file upload (Thursday, 25 November)
• SPARQL protocol and HTTP Update : HTML file upload (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: SPARQL WG minutes for 2010-11-23 (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: CASE (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: xs:string return types: [was Re: function library summary and issues] (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) (Wednesday, 17 November)
• xs:string return types: [was Re: function library summary and issues] (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Nov. 9, 2010 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Nov. 9, 2010 (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: ISSUE-59 - Shortcuts for Update (Friday, 5 November)
• Translation of SPARQL syntax to SPARQL algebra (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: More minimalistic proposal than potentially bound (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/329) (Thursday, 4 November)
• SPARQL protocol (Thursday, 4 November)
• SPARQL XML Result errata (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: grouping by expressions (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: grouping by expressions (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: grouping by expressions (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: grouping by expressions (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Comments responses (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: Updated delete tests (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: FILTER inside FILTER? (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: More minimalistic proposal than potentially bound (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/329) (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: Updated delete tests (Saturday, 30 October)
• BIND - a question of detail (Thursday, 21 October)
• BIND: some tests (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: Proposed response to DB-1 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Proposed response to DB-1 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: yacker grammar (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: yacker grammar (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: preparation for next TC... please point me to unapproved test cases... (Monday, 18 October)
• Proposed response to DR-1 (Saturday, 16 October)
• Proposed response to JC-3 (Saturday, 16 October)
• Re: RK-1 (Saturday, 16 October)
• Re: preparation for next TC... please point me to unapproved test cases... (Saturday, 16 October)
• Re: preparation for next TC... please point me to unapproved test cases... (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: another question on "SELECT *" (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: another question on "SELECT *" (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: BIND, FILTERs and BGPs (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: BIND, FILTERs and BGPs (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: GROUP question (Thursday, 14 October)
• GROUP question (Thursday, 14 October)
• BIND, FILTERs and BGPs (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: short before the call... remaining issues on LET/BIND/ASSIGN (Tuesday, 12 October)
• [protocol] [SPARQL-http] HTTP status codes (Sunday, 10 October)
• Re: Preparing a document for publication (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: More Aggregates questions ... Another scalar parameter for GROUP_CONCAT? (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: Aggregates question... (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL1.1 Update review part 2 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: Question about BINDINGS (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: Question about BINDINGS (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: NOT EXISTS {P} = ! (EXISTS {P} ) , yes? (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Review of Update Formal Model (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: charter extension/updating the schedule (Saturday, 2 October)
• [tests] Test for GROUP BY (Friday, 1 October)
• Re: Resolution for ISSUE-37 (Friday, 1 October)

Axel Polleres

• 2010-12-21 TC minutes ... (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) (Tuesday, 21 December)
• new comment on HTTP Update Protocol... volunteers? (Tuesday, 21 December)
• "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-21 Agenda (Merry Christmas edition) (Monday, 20 December)
• SPARQL TC 2010-12-21 Agenda (Merry Christmas edition) (Monday, 20 December)
• rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 (Monday, 20 December)
• property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: Another thing on property paths... (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: Another thing on property paths... (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Another thing on property paths... (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Another thing on property paths... (Friday, 17 December)
• Another thing on property paths... (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: stumbled upon ACTION-200 CONSTRUCT WHERE shortcut... (Wednesday, 15 December)
• HTTP-update-ISSUES, feedback for next TC, all? (Tuesday, 14 December)
• ACTION-347 done (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: stumbled upon ACTION-200 CONSTRUCT WHERE shortcut... (Tuesday, 14 December)
• last week's minutes http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-12-07 (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: Dave Beckett's Comment (Tuesday, 14 December)
• critical open ACTIONS for LC... (Monday, 13 December)
• ACTION-325 completed... (Monday, 13 December)
• stumbled upon ACTION-200 CONSTRUCT WHERE shortcut... (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-14 - agenda for tomorrow (Monday, 13 December)
• SPARQL TC 2010-12-14 - agenda for tomorrow (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Importing RIF (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Importing RIF (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Importing RIF (Sunday, 12 December)
• Importing RIF (Friday, 10 December)
• SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: ACTION-330 test cases around '+' for string concatenation (Tuesday, 30 November)
• ACTION-326 + ACTION-327 ... test README.html updated... (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: ACTION-330 test cases around '+' for string concatenation (Tuesday, 30 November)
• ACTION-330 test cases around '+' for string concatenation (Tuesday, 30 November)
• TC 2010-11-23 (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Please *all* comment on the comments page! (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Kjetil's comments (Wednesday, 17 November)
• draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) (Wednesday, 17 November)
• function library summary and issues (Tuesday, 16 November)
• minutes from today's TC (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Update shortcuts summary and discussion (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-11-16 Agenda (Monday, 15 November)
• SPARQL TC 2010-11-16 Agenda (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: functions detail: lang/langmatches (Wednesday, 3 November)
• functions detail: lang/langmatches (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: Comments responses (Tuesday, 2 November)
• next week agenda (2010-10-26) (Saturday, 23 October)
• Re: Proposed response to DB-1 (Wednesday, 20 October)
• Minutes from today's TC (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Fixing the update test case vocabulary. (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: preparation for next TC... please point me to unapproved test cases... (Monday, 18 October)
• Agenda 2010-10-19 (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: preparation for next TC... please point me to unapproved test cases... (Monday, 18 October)
• Fixing the update test case vocabulary. (Monday, 18 October)
• preparation for next TC... please point me to unapproved test cases... (Friday, 15 October)
• WD Publications are out... (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: BIND, FILTERs and BGPs (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: RK-1 (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: another question on "SELECT *" (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: another question on "SELECT *" (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: BIND, FILTERs and BGPs (Thursday, 14 October)
• RK-1 (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Comments GK-1 and 2 (Thursday, 14 October)
• another question on "SELECT *" (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: GROUP question (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: BIND, FILTERs and BGPs (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Comments GK-1 and 2 (Thursday, 14 October)
• draft response GK-3 (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: + for fn:concat (Tuesday, 12 October)
• response to RV-4 (Tuesday, 12 October)
• minutes from today's RC... (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: short before the call... remaining issues on LET/BIND/ASSIGN (Tuesday, 12 October)
• short before the call... remaining issues on LET/BIND/ASSIGN (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-10-12 (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: Preparing a document for publication (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: Aggregates question... (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL1.1 Update review part 2 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL1.1 Update review part 2 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Thursday, 7 October)
• SPARQL1.1 Update review part 2 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: some more comments on Fed query doc... (was: Re: Review of Query document (basic federated query)) (Thursday, 7 October)
• More Aggregates questions ... Another scalar parameter for GROUP_CONCAT? (Thursday, 7 October)
• Aggregates question... (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: Question about BINDINGS (Wednesday, 6 October)
• MINUS vs NOT EXISTS question... and some suggestion for rewording. (Tuesday, 5 October)
• NOT EXISTS {P} = ! (EXISTS {P} ) , yes? (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Question about BINDINGS (Tuesday, 5 October)
• some more comments on Fed query doc... (was: Re: Review of Query document (basic federated query)) (Tuesday, 5 October)
• minutes from today's TC (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Agenda TC 2010-10-05 (Monday, 4 October)
• charter extension/updating the schedule (Friday, 1 October)
• Re: Resolution for ISSUE-37 (Thursday, 30 September)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)

Birte Glimm

• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Wednesday, 22 December)
• This week's minutes (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: Importing RIF (Sunday, 12 December)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda (Saturday, 11 December)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Draft response: JP-1 (Property Paths) (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: FILTER inside FILTER? (Tuesday, 2 November)
• FILTER inside FILTER? (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: More minimalisic proposal than potentially bound (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/329) (Wednesday, 27 October)
• More minimalisic proposal than potentially bound (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/329) (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Document Preparation for Publication (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Preparing a document for publication (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: Formatting issues (Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317)) (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317) (Sunday, 3 October)
• Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317) (Saturday, 2 October)

Carlos Buil Aranda

• Re: new version of fed query (Monday, 20 December)
• new version of fed query (Monday, 20 December)
• apologies for tomorrow (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: some more comments on Fed query doc... (was: Re: Review of Query document (basic federated query)) (Friday, 8 October)

Chimezie Ogbuji

• Draft response to Ian Davis' comment (Friday, 31 December)
• ?graph= to use only absolute URIs (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Changes to editor's draft of the SPARQL 1.1 HTTP Protocol (Monday, 20 December)
• Changes to editor's draft of the SPARQL 1.1 HTTP Protocol (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: SPARQL protocol and HTTP Update : HTML file upload (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Regrets for today (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: http-rdf-update and the default graph (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317) (Tuesday, 5 October)

Enrico Franconi

• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Fwd: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: yacker grammar (Tuesday, 19 October)
• yacker grammar (Tuesday, 19 October)

Gregory Williams

• Re: Call for issues and comment on JSON result format (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: Call for issues and comment on JSON result format (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Call for issues and comment on JSON result format (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-14 - agenda for tomorrow (Monday, 13 December)
• SPARQL Namespaces (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Details of string operations (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Details of string operations (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: ACTION-330 test cases around '+' for string concatenation (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: grouping by expressions (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: grouping by expressions (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: Updated delete tests (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: More minimalisic proposal than potentially bound (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/329) (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: BIND - a question of detail (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: Agenda 2010-10-19 (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: RK-1 (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: RK-1 (Thursday, 14 October)

Guido Vetere

• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Monday, 6 December)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Importing RIF (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Importing RIF (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Importing RIF (Sunday, 12 December)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Sunday, 28 November)
• Fwd: Beware of W3C Accounting Phishing (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Formatting issues (Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317)) (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317) (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Formatting issues (Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317)) (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317) (Sunday, 3 October)
• Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317) (Friday, 1 October)

Kendall Clark

• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: CASE (Thursday, 18 November)

Lee Feigenbaum

• Re: To SPARQL Last Call - attention editors (Wednesday, 29 December)
• WSDL and POSTing SPARQL Update requests directly (Friday, 24 December)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results (Thursday, 23 December)
• Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Tuesday, 21 December)
• To SPARQL Last Call - attention editors (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Update security issues (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda (Friday, 10 December)
• Reminder: SPARQL Protocol teleconference in 30 minutes (Wednesday, 8 December)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Draft response: JP-1 (Property Paths) (Wednesday, 1 December)
• SPARQL WG minutes, Tues. Nov. 30, 2010 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 30 November)
• SPARQL WG Agenda -- Tues. Nov. 30, 2010 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• SPARQL Protocol Working Session TC - Wed. Dec. 8 @ 11am ET (Wednesday, 24 November)
• SPARQL WG minutes for 2010-11-23 (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Scheduling poll for SPARQL Protocol working session telecon (Tuesday, 23 November)
• CASE (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-11-16 Agenda (Monday, 15 November)
• Topics for next week - shortcuts in update, group by expressions, (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Nov. 9, 2010 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Nov. 9, 2010 (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Minutes from SPARQL WG, 2010-11-02 (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: functions detail: lang/langmatches (Wednesday, 3 November)
• what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Tuesday, 2 November)
• grouping by expressions (Tuesday, 2 November)
• generating tests overview page (Tuesday, 2 November)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. November 2, 2010 (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: BIND - a question of detail (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: Comments responses (Tuesday, 2 November)
• SPARQL WG Alert! Teleconference one hour _earlier_ outside of the US this week (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: Meeting minutes (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: GROUP question (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: another question on "SELECT *" (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: BIND, FILTERs and BGPs (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: response to RV-4 (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: Comments GK-1 and 2 (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: More Aggregates questions ... Another scalar parameter for GROUP_CONCAT? (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: Agenda TC 2010-10-05 (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: LET / BIND / Assignment test cases (ISSUE-57) (Sunday, 3 October)

Matt Perry

• Re: Updated delete tests (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: Updated delete tests (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: Updated delete tests (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: Updated delete tests (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: Updated delete tests (Monday, 1 November)
• Updated delete tests (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: preparation for next TC... please point me to unapproved test cases... (Friday, 15 October)

Matthew Perry

• Regrets for today (Tuesday, 23 November)

Nicholas Humfrey

• Regrets (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Regrets for today (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Regrets (Tuesday, 9 November)

Olivier Corby

• Regrets for today (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Regrets for today (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Regrets for today's TC (Tuesday, 19 October)

Paul Gearon

• Change of status (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Update security issues (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: Open issues in HTTP/Update protocol (for discussion) (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: md5sum and sha1sum functions (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: md5sum and sha1sum functions (Monday, 6 December)
• md5sum and sha1sum functions (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: CASE (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Meeting minutes (Tuesday, 26 October)
• At risk (Tuesday, 5 October)

Polleres, Axel

• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Importing RIF (Sunday, 12 December)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2010-12-07 agenda (Friday, 10 December)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: Call for issues and comment on JSON result format (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: md5sum and sha1sum functions (Saturday, 4 December)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. November 2, 2010 (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: RV-4 (Tuesday, 19 October)

Souri Das

• regrets for today's meeting (Tuesday, 12 October)

Souripriya Das

• Re: Regrets for today (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Regrets (Tuesday, 2 November)

SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-64: Should we incude an entailment regime for OWL with non-distinguished variables and no result bnodes? (Tuesday, 21 December)
• ISSUE-63: Handling of default graph in HTTP update protocol (Tuesday, 5 October)

Steve Harris

• Re: Details of dateTime operations (Wednesday, 29 December)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Format of SPARQL Update results (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• ACTION-209, ACTION-328 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: rq25.xml String functions definitions - first shot (ACTION-350) (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: new version of fed query (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: stumbled upon ACTION-200 CONSTRUCT WHERE shortcut... (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: Dave Beckett's Comment (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Regrets (Monday, 13 December)
• Dave Beckett's Comment (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn (Sunday, 12 December)
• Re: md5sum and sha1sum functions (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: md5sum and sha1sum functions (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: md5sum and sha1sum functions (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Details of string operations (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Details of string operations (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Details of dateTime operations (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Details of dateTime operations (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Details of dateTime operations (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Details of string operations (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Details of string operations (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Draft response: JP-1 (Property Paths) (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re: Changes to Query 1.1 doc (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Appologies (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Changes to Query 1.1 doc (Monday, 29 November)
• Changes to Query 1.1 doc (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: Proposed RAND() defn (Monday, 29 November)
• Proposed RAND() defn (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: POST & HTTP Update (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: POST & HTTP Update (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: SPARQL protocol and HTTP Update : HTML file upload (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: SPARQL protocol and HTTP Update : HTML file upload (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: function library summary and issues (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: xs:string return types: [was Re: function library summary and issues] (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET) (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: grouping by expressions (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: functions detail: lang/langmatches (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: grouping by expressions (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: grouping by expressions (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: grouping by expressions (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: grouping by expressions (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1? (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: Comments responses (Tuesday, 2 November)
• RV-4 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: another question on "SELECT *" (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: GROUP question (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Comments GK-1 and 2 (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: GROUP question (Thursday, 14 October)
• Comments GK-1 and 2 (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: More Aggregates questions ... Another scalar parameter for GROUP_CONCAT? (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: More Aggregates questions ... Another scalar parameter for GROUP_CONCAT? (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: Aggregates question... (Thursday, 7 October)
• Review of SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs review, rev1.56 (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: Agenda TC 2010-10-05 (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: charter extension/updating the schedule (Saturday, 2 October)
• Re: [tests] Test for GROUP BY (Friday, 1 October)

Umberto Straccia

• Re: "Summary for informed outsiders" - Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime (Thursday, 23 December)

Last message date: Friday, 31 December 2010 16:02:30 UTC