W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:11:04 -0500
Message-ID: <4D132E48.2010108@thefigtrees.net>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 12/23/2010 5:23 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
> On 2010-12-21, at 13:57, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>
>> As one step towards Last Call, can we agree that the grammar is complete as is? i.e., we do not intend to change any elements of the grammar beyond decisions that have already been made, whether it by syntax, keywords, functions, or anything else.
>>
>> If you think there is still any outstanding issues that impact on the grammar, please speak up ASAP -- otherwise we'll conclude that it the grammar is complete in a couple of days.
>
> When you say as-is, can you provide a pointer to a specific version?

Whatever's in CVS right now? I don't monitor deltas from checkin to 
checkin, but I was under the impression that the grammar has not been 
changing from checkin to checkin recently.

> It's a bit hard to agree without that.

Note that I'm not saying that we can't find bugs or such in the grammar 
and fix them, just asking if there are issues we have not dealt with or 
concluded that impact the grammar. Do you have something specific in mind?

Lee

>
> - Steve
>
Received on Thursday, 23 December 2010 11:11:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT