W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Dave Beckett's Comment

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:55:20 +0000
Message-Id: <39275BD7-B24A-4550-8528-17FC7DF52C71@garlik.com>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
My (incomplete, see below) draft response is at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DBeckett-1

One thing he raises is:

“"SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
is rather a long title; what does 'Uniform' or 'HTTP' add?  SOAP is dead.
suggest "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Graph Management Protocol"
or RDF dataset”

I'm inclined to agree, but do we want to discuss a rename of the document at this point, or are we happy with it as is?


“9 Property Paths
I am unlikely to ever implement any of this, it's a second query
language inside SPARQL.  How many systems implemented this before
the SPARQL 1.1 work was started?”

I don't know the answer to that offhand, did we find that when we were voting for what features to include?

- Steve

Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Monday, 13 December 2010 12:17:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:02 UTC