- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:55:20 +0000
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
My (incomplete, see below) draft response is at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DBeckett-1 One thing he raises is: “"SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" is rather a long title; what does 'Uniform' or 'HTTP' add? SOAP is dead. suggest "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Graph Management Protocol" or RDF dataset” I'm inclined to agree, but do we want to discuss a rename of the document at this point, or are we happy with it as is? another: “9 Property Paths I am unlikely to ever implement any of this, it's a second query language inside SPARQL. How many systems implemented this before the SPARQL 1.1 work was started?” I don't know the answer to that offhand, did we find that when we were voting for what features to include? - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Monday, 13 December 2010 12:17:21 UTC