W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

POST & HTTP Update

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:50:42 +0000
Message-ID: <4CEE77C2.2090402@epimorphics.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

On 25/11/10 10:40, Steve Harris wrote:
> The fact that POST updates are not yet fully specified in http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/#http-post is a source of concern to us.
> - Steve

Could you say what isn't specified and should be?

Currently I use the Content-type to get the syntax, the body is the 
payload and payload = RDF document from earlier in the spec.

I return 200 if the target existed, and 201 if it didn't which is my 
(limited) understand of correct status codes for HTTP.

Received on Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:51:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:02 UTC