W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Call for issues and comment on JSON result format

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:30:27 -0800
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <710D2CEF-4FB0-4D25-8111-559033BFE00F@evilfunhouse.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
On Dec 21, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> On 21/12/10 17:08, Gregory Williams wrote:
>> I wanted to ask whether there'd be any support for adding JSONP[1] to the json results format. This would probably also involve the Protocol doc. It would allow easier use of sparql from within browsers.
> I don't see anything to add to the JSON result doc (the results format) - did you have anything specific in mind?

Nothing specific. I just didn't know if it should be mentioned in the JSON document that the format might include a function call because of things upstream in the protocol.

Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2010 21:31:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:02 UTC