- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:28:47 +0000
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Just realised, I hadn't completed ACTION-325 on the test case README.html yet, now done: "ACTION-325: Change nested use of ut:data to ut:graph" check http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html ... New text: "Named graphs are described either - analogous to the qt:graphData property from the query test vocabulary - by explicit URI reference (in which case the graph name is supposed to correspong to the respective URI reference), or the object of the ut:graphData property may be a resource further described in terms of an ut:graph and an rdfs:label property. Here, the ut:graph property is a URI reference to an RDF graph, whereas the rdfs:label property with plain literal value indicates the graph's name under which it is accessible in the graph store. The ability to assign a "name" differnt from the URI reference name explicitly to a named graph in a graph store is needed to denote different graphs by the same name to describe the status of a named graph prior and after execution of an update." Axel
Received on Monday, 13 December 2010 22:29:17 UTC