W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010


From: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:11:29 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTikVbpsUD1ziWmdTjdLUW54-B-_mkbA3YnXyskdc@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Cc: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Andy Seaborne
<andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:
>> I would like a CASE function, and it would be trivial to implement.
>> However, I think that your concerns about the timeframe are more
>> relevant here.

We have a forthcoming RDF database product that will (by 1.0 release)
support SPARQL 1.1. But we wouldn't support adding CASE to it, for the
same reasons, i.e., timeframe. FWIW.

Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 15:12:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:02 UTC