W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Dave Beckett's Comment

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:21:48 +0000
Message-ID: <4D061DEC.3080709@epimorphics.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


On 13/12/10 11:55, Steve Harris wrote:
> My (incomplete, see below) draft response is at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DBeckett-1
>
> One thing he raises is:

Points 1 and 2 on his list in II seem to relate to the transformation 
from syntax to algebra (which is work-in-progress).

>
> “"SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
> is rather a long title; what does 'Uniform' or 'HTTP' add?  SOAP is dead.
> suggest "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Graph Management Protocol"
> or RDF dataset”
>
> I'm inclined to agree, but do we want to discuss a rename of the document at this point, or are we happy with it as is?
>
> another:
>
> “9 Property Paths
> I am unlikely to ever implement any of this, it's a second query
> language inside SPARQL.  How many systems implemented this before
> the SPARQL 1.1 work was started?”
>
> I don't know the answer to that offhand, did we find that when we were voting for what features to include?

I know of:

cwm, ARQ, Virtuoso, PSPARQL, SPARQLeR, SPARQ2L, GLEEN

e.g. Lee gathered this list:

http://esw.w3.org/SPARQL/Extensions/Paths
February and July 2008

	Andy

>
> - Steve
>
Received on Monday, 13 December 2010 13:22:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT