W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

ACTION-209, ACTION-328

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:38:43 +0000
Message-Id: <CA4F4821-CD08-4841-9442-47216C53C71A@garlik.com>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I think these are both dealt with by the text in CVS HEAD.

"The HAVING expression is evaluated using the same rules as FILTER(). Note that, due to the logic position in which the HAVING clause is evaluated, expresisons projected by the SELECT clause are not visible to the HAVING clause."

"Note that ListEval((unbond) = (E), as the evaluation of an unbound expression is an error."

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2010 12:39:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT