W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Update shortcuts summary and discussion

From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:17:14 +0800
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9C49F440-1002-4FAD-98D3-E874DD602A59@deri.org>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Hi,

On 17 Nov 2010, at 02:09, Axel Polleres wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> we still couldn't reach agreement on the update shortcuts emtirely. In principle there are two competing proposals on the table:
> 
> 
> PROPOSED: Add update shortcuts in LC marked explicitly "AT RISK" and asking for feedback, explicitly about potentially complicating the language, and implementation experience.
> vs.
> 
> PROPOSED: postpone ISSUE-59 
> 
> We only voted formally on the former (that would imply closing ISSUE-59) but got a lot of abstentions (4 +1,5 abstain or 0, 0 -1) and there was reservations on going forward with this as a resolution today. The latter had some friends in the group, but I didn't want to vote over it without hearing Alex' opinion.

My preference will be for the first option - if we explicitly ask for feedback / objections from the community when publishing the LC.

Best,

Alex.

> 
> So, my goal would be - without tow much further discussion - put these two up for vote again next time and go with the less controversial one. By less controversial, I mean 
> a) nobody lying on the road in front of it
> b) less abstentions
> in that order of priority.
> 
> Axel

--
Dr. Alexandre Passant
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
:me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 13:17:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT