- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:59:48 +0100
- To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
GK-1 is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Sep/0000.html, but GK-2 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Oct/0001.html Says to ignore GK-1. Do they still require a formal response? Seems a bit excessive. I suspect that GK-1 should be ignored, and GK-2 should be linked to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Oct/0000.html - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 16:00:24 UTC