W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: RK-1

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:54:09 -0300
Cc: "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <065D5FF1-97EB-43D6-8C87-F8BD52DB61A0@deri.org>
To: "Gregory Williams" <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
As I said, I think that essentially Reto would be happy with a short reply... I just want it off the table.

How about I just send the first part, without your detailed comments?

Axel

On 14 Oct 2010, at 12:16, Gregory Williams wrote:

> On Oct 14, 2010, at 6:59 AM, Axel Polleres wrote:
> 
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > I assume you drafted http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RK-1 ?
> 
> Hi Axel. I had sent you an email about drafting that back when RK-1 first came in. Do note, though, that my draft only contained responses to the service description portion of RK-1, not the Update, Protocol, or Federation portions. Also, that's been sitting around for quite some time, so some of my answers are out of date (for example, the WD being published today already addresses the RDFS information styling issue).
> 
> thanks,
> .greg
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 16:54:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT