W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Fixing the update test case vocabulary.

From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:01:23 +0100
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <001729E9-1FDC-4DA5-BE60-32A6DA38F924@deri.org>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Hi Axel,

## Minor editorial comments

** In http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/test-update.n3

:   rdfs:comment     "Some extraocabulary for update test cases this vocabulary extends qt: to describe update test cases." ;

=> "Some extra vocabulary for SPARQL Update test cases. This vocabulary extends qt: to describe update test cases."

** In [1]

1) "the graph store is supposed to be empty prior to execution of the update."

=> By empty, you mean with an empty default graph and no named graph, right ? Can it be more explicit.

2) "the graphs in the graph store are href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-graph-equality">"

=> Missing "<a" tag

## On the tests themselves (manifestl.ttl)

1) Manifest definition

rdfs:label "Basic update test cases" ;

=>  Basic SPARQL Update text-case

2) On :insert-data-spo-named1 / :insert-data-spo-named2

rdfs:comment "This is a simple insert of a single triple to a named graph ..." ;"

=> Could it mention named of the NG <http://example.org/1>

3)     mf:result [ ut:result ut:Success ; 

=> Should be ut:success (or change to Success in the test-update.n3, which I'd prefer)

Besides that, the 4 TC looks of for me.
Haven't check the DELETE ones so far.


On 18 Oct 2010, at 03:06, Axel Polleres wrote:

> Dear all,
> I updated the Test case README document [1] specifying the update test case vocabulary [2]
> As opposed to reusing the qt:data and qt:graphData properties, which turned out to be problematic,
> I created new ut:data and ut:graphData properties.
> Please find some initial basic test cases, mainly meant to illustrate the vocabulary at:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/basic-update/
> If the group (particularly the update editors) would be ok to go ahead with that, it would be geat if we could approve those initial testcases and go ahead.
> Axel
> 1. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html
> 2. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/test-update.n3
> 3.
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/basic-update/

Dr. Alexandre Passant
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
:me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 16:02:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:02 UTC