W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:36:23 +0000
Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3007E327-9D8D-4D81-AFBA-9ACDFE33CD7F@garlik.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
RAND ( expression ) is still in there.

ENCODE_FOR_URI, and some of the other recently agreed functions are missing too.

I had an action to look at including CONSTRUCT WHERE { ... } for commonality with DELETE WHERE. I've not done anything about that, but it looks to me like it could be included as:

'CONSTRUCT WHERE' GroupGraphPattern SolutionModifier

- Steve

On 2010-12-23, at 10:29, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> Greg pointed out that META has sneaked into the grammar in rq25.  Please ignore it.
> 	Andy
> On 21/12/10 13:57, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>> As one step towards Last Call, can we agree that the grammar is complete
>> as is? i.e., we do not intend to change any elements of the grammar
>> beyond decisions that have already been made, whether it by syntax,
>> keywords, functions, or anything else.
>> If you think there is still any outstanding issues that impact on the
>> grammar, please speak up ASAP -- otherwise we'll conclude that it the
>> grammar is complete in a couple of days.
>> thanks,
>> Lee

Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Thursday, 23 December 2010 11:36:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:02 UTC