W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:47:36 +0000
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <BCBF5B57-1760-4E59-BC27-1B0EF78CBD5E@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
On 30 Nov 2010, at 15:34, Enrico Franconi wrote:

> On 30 Nov 2010, at 15:40, Bijan Parsia wrote:
[snip]
> Not at all. You think wrong.
[snip]
> I guess that you implicitly admitted that *as a theoretician* the answer would be yes :-)
[snip]
> A bit radical here. What about the OWL2-QL and OWL2-EL communities?
[snip]
> Interesting argument.
[snip]
> LOL.
[snip]
> The benefit is to allow, for example, OWL2-QL people to work using a standard as opposed to work by inventing their own syntax.
[snip]
>> Can you put me in contact with them? Mediated communication isn't very efficient.
> 
> Ah, so you don't trust me.


I'm not very happy with the way you are conducting this email conversation, but that's a bit orthogonal.

If you would prefer to convey questions from me to people then we can do that. It's a bit more time consuming and less fluid, but could be done. I'm still interested in talking with such people regardless of the group outcome. I suggest, if this is the case, that we take that part off list. I can summarize when done.

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:48:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT