- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:47:36 +0000
- To: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 30 Nov 2010, at 15:34, Enrico Franconi wrote: > On 30 Nov 2010, at 15:40, Bijan Parsia wrote: [snip] > Not at all. You think wrong. [snip] > I guess that you implicitly admitted that *as a theoretician* the answer would be yes :-) [snip] > A bit radical here. What about the OWL2-QL and OWL2-EL communities? [snip] > Interesting argument. [snip] > LOL. [snip] > The benefit is to allow, for example, OWL2-QL people to work using a standard as opposed to work by inventing their own syntax. [snip] >> Can you put me in contact with them? Mediated communication isn't very efficient. > > Ah, so you don't trust me. I'm not very happy with the way you are conducting this email conversation, but that's a bit orthogonal. If you would prefer to convey questions from me to people then we can do that. It's a bit more time consuming and less fluid, but could be done. I'm still interested in talking with such people regardless of the group outcome. I suggest, if this is the case, that we take that part off list. I can summarize when done. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:48:32 UTC