W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Format of SPARQL Update results

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:20:18 +0000
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <96595B22-F2A8-44AA-8F9A-8C27EFBF2F68@garlik.com>
To: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
On 2010-12-23, at 10:07, Alexandre Passant wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Reading the discussion about JSON serialization of query results, I figured out that we don't have a proper format for results of SPARQL Update queries.
> Since we agreed to send only success / failure as a result, I suggest to use the boolean return form (as for ASK) with true / false values depending on the success / failure (so that it does not require updates to the XML / JSON result formats).
> 
> I don't think we need a formal vote for that, but if anyone objects or have other opinions, please let me know. 
> If not, I'll include that to the next round of publishing.

Due to user requests we added some text along the lines of "12 triples added, 7 removed" in the response to a SPARQL Update requests in 5store. So, whatever format is specified, I'd like to be able to include some human readable text somewhere.

Worst case it can go in a XML comment, but that's not ideal.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Thursday, 23 December 2010 10:20:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT