W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1?

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:34:47 +0000
Message-ID: <4CD19D37.1080708@epimorphics.com>
To: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
CC: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


On 03/11/10 17:25, Paul Gearon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Paul Gearon<gearon@ieee.org>  wrote:
> <snip/>
>> Math/Logic
>> Many of these are already covered, but I'd like to see:
>>   if(cond, true-expr, false-expr)
>> I believe this is already possible, but an if() function makes certain
>> tasks much easier.
>
> Sorry, I forgot that IF has been included in the builtins already.
> It's not documented yet, but I presume that it operates as I remember:
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-query-20100601/#func-if
>
> So please ignore that part of my earlier email.
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>

Wrong version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-query-20101014/

See

http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#func-if

We should charge for saying "it's not done yet" - pay in HTML content to 
include.

	Andy
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2010 17:35:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT