W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Comments responses

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:41:26 +0000
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <30040279-B31A-4AD5-92FA-B76A58FBB45D@deri.org>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
I am fine with the response to DR-1. I am also fine with the response to JC-3 in the 
light of the current draft, but overall I ask myself whether the recent comment by Jorge [1] 
and what we intend to do about it will also affect JC-3 on the long run?
[1] questions the approach of translation to union patterns in general and seems to have 
some quite reasonable arguments regarding efficiency (exponential answers) and previous 
work (how XPath does it).

Opinions?

Axel

1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Oct/0064.html


On 2 Nov 2010, at 10:51, Steve Harris wrote:

> On 2010-11-01, at 22:44, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> 
> > currently waiting approval:
> >
> > Proposed response to DR-1
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0118.html
> >
> > Proposed response to JC-3
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0117.html
> 
> They seem fine to me.
> 
> - Steve
> 
> --
> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 11:42:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT