W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: another question on "SELECT *"

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:18:38 +0100
Cc: "Lee Feigenbaum" <lee@thefigtrees.net>, "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <959E543B-D90C-4D40-B67C-BE0B06D255AF@garlik.com>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
On 2010-10-14, at 13:33, Axel Polleres wrote:

> As for aggregates (mentioned by Andy),  
> 
>  SELECT * (agg(Expr) AS ?var)
> 
> could indeed make sense, taken that * implicitly projects all grouped variables 
> (following the definition of "potentially bound")

My recollection is that we had a strawpoll and the majority were in favour of retaining the meaning of * from SPARQL 1.0. Could be wrong though.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 13:19:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT