W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET)

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:35:14 +0000
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <78DC88CD-8A26-43AC-B366-EDCA5EA9E46B@garlik.com>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
On 2010-11-17, at 11:28, Axel Polleres wrote:

> 
> On 17 Nov 2010, at 11:15, Steve Harris wrote:
> 
>> Seems fine, but is it BIND() BIND() or BIND() ()?
> 
> not sure as I couldn't find it in the grammar yet, Andy?
> (I have no strong feelings on either)

BIND() BIND() might leave more syntax options open in the future, but no strong preference.

- Steve

>> It's probably right, just checking the response is correct.
>> 
>> - Steve
>> 
>> On 2010-11-17, at 10:42, Axel Polleres wrote:
>> 
>>> I put up a draft response for
>>> 
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Nov/0005.html
>>> 
>>> at
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JG-1
>>> 
>>> Let me know whether you're ok with that or whether you think whether we should wait until BIND is specified further in the draft.
>>> 
>>> Axel
>> 
>> --
>> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
>> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
>> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
>> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
>> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
>> 
>> 
> 

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 11:35:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT