W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: what functions should we include in SPARQL 1.1?

From: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:41:45 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=-PxLs6y86i0d5aH-GA68V+OXzk3-h_LQedWPq@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Andy Seaborne
<andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:
>> Sorry, I forgot that IF has been included in the builtins already.
>> It's not documented yet, but I presume that it operates as I remember:
>>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-query-20100601/#func-if
>>
>> So please ignore that part of my earlier email.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Paul
>>
>
> Wrong version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-query-20101014/
>
> See
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#func-if
>
> We should charge for saying "it's not done yet" - pay in HTML content to
> include.

In fact, I had just realized my error and was coming back to apologize
when I saw your email.  My apologies.  :-}

Paul
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2010 17:42:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT